nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

UNSCEAR`s lies spread to Wikipedia and Beyond!

 

…In short, as the Wikipedia entry does mention, the Insurance industry does not expect any major losses. I think that is the most honest statement within the Wikipeadia entry that actually speaks in volumes to us…..

Screenshot from 2014-05-09 02:02:07

Op Ed by Arclight2011part2

Date 8 May 2014

Posted to nuclear-news.net

Main reference is from the program “Contact”, hosted by “Our Planet TV”, Japan.

Four months after the nuclear disaster at Fukushima Daichi NPP, the presenter Hajime Shiraishi interviewed Mika Noro who was the president of The Bridge to Chernobyl and who also founded the National Parents Network to Protect the Children From Radiation in Japan in response to the nuclear disaster there.

Because she was engaged in bringing children from Chernobyl to Hakkaido before Japans own nuclear disaster, she noticed that symptoms being reported concerning the children of Fukushima seemed to resemble the symptoms that the Chernobyl children suffer from.

Miss Shiraishi noted on the program that the media in Japan were not documenting these health effects. As a result of this Miss Noro organised pediatric doctors and with Our Planet TV`s help set about trying to get more data on this phenomena.

By Mid June 2011 they were ready to check out 500 children. Some of the health effects they found were;

“Torrential nosebleeds”

“Continuing Diarrhea”

“Irritation of the throat”

“Severe Fatigue”

“Swollen Lymph Glands”

Interestingly, they noted that it was not only children that had these symptoms.

@7.06 mins

Then Dr Masamichi Nishio who was chief of the Hokkaido Cancer Centre responded to these findings by saying that:

“If this many people are having these symptoms, I think doctors need to recognise these as new clinical symptoms of low dose radiation exposure”

In response to the Fukushima Hospitals response to the concerns of the Parents he said;

“I don`t think they can simply dismiss them as symptoms of a mere cold”

Both Doctors Yablakov and Nesterenko found that, in Chernobyl, these combined symptoms were likely due to a “considerable amount of radiation exposure”. And four months after the disaster CRIIRAD of France showed the high levels still existing in the general area of Fukushima city in a dramatic way;

CRIIRAD shows heavy radiation levels not accepted by UNSCEAR and the ICRP in this video.

(…Radiation rates are given in counts per second (c/s). With this device, normal values should be about 50 to 150 c/s depending on natural radiation.
The powerful gamma radiations emitted by radioactive caesium deposited on the ground of the parking located in front of the building give a radiation rate about 10 times above normal values inside the building (at the centre of the office), and 15 times above near the window. This radiation will decrease only very slowly. After one year, the decrease should be about 23 % only….)

Of course the World Health Organisations 2013 report underpinned by the UNSCEAR findings  show that only 4,000 people are expected to get cancer throughout the whole of Europe as a result of Chernobyl. However, Dr Ian Fairlie recently analysed UNSCEAR`s own contrived figures and actually found the number of cases, based on their own contrived figures to be actually 40,000 cancer deaths as a result of Chernobyl.

Dr Fairlie also projected the figures that UNSCEAR used to come up with what Nature.com  reported as being as a result of the Fukushima nuclear disaster as;

“Very few cancer cases would be expected as a result of accumulated radiation exposures” G. Brumfield 2013 ( Who even  had the temerity to state that this was “Good news” ).

http://blogs.nature.com/news/2012/05/world-health-organization-weighs-in-on-fukushima.html

Dr Fairlie`s findings showed that the actual figure, using the contrived figures of the Japanese nuclear lobby, would be 1,500 cases as a result of the Japanese disaster.

http://www.ianfairlie.org/news/new-unscear-report-on-fukushima-collective-doses/

If you go to the wikipedia entry for the Fukushima disaster you will see that they do not give actual figures for the section entitled “Risks from radiation” but give percentages. These percentages include the whole population of Japan and the beginning of this section starts of with G Brumfiel`s quote above. This gives a very reassuring complexion on the disaster and with the evidence I have submitted above, a very distorted and biased view emerges.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster

The Wikipedia entry then goes onto reference the term Radiophobia and Hormesis as you work through the links not mentioning the counter arguments and context in which they are mentioned. No mention of the Fukushima Medical Hospitals diagnosis given to parents of cold symptoms is within this entry either. No mention of the possible genetic and other health effects that are seen in Belarus and Ukraine that are being dealt with by a plethora of organisations such as Chernobyl Children International concerning a reported 6,000 babies a year born with various heart defects either.

In short, as the Wikipedia entry does mention, the Insurance industry does not expect any major losses. I think that is the most honest statement within the Wikipeadia entry that actually speaks in volumes to us.

Here are more links proving the UNSCEAR lies;

…..IAEA block has blocked the publication of studies carried out by WHO that show major health effects due to radiation. A few specialists, like Dr Ian Fairlie, study the risk of low level radiation, but it’s really difficult to get statistics…..

https://nuclear-news.net/2014/02/01/speech-by-linda-walker-chernobyl-childrens-project/

….For the past 10 years, the programme has been treating a significant portion of the 6,000 Ukrainian children born with genetic heart diseases every year. Many of these conditions, known as the ‘Chernobyl heart’, have been linked to the radiation leaks from the Chernobyl nuclear plant accident in 1986…..

https://nuclear-news.net/2014/04/14/kiev-crisis-halts-chernobyl-charitys-e3m-surgery-plan-children-at-risk/

….The thing is, there has been a consistent downplaying the likely health effects of the Fukushima accident and an over-hyping of nuclear power’s “green” energy profile….. http://www.thepaltrysapien.com/2012/07/fukushima-worse-than-chernobyl-for-kids/

“Radiophobia” examines the Chernobyl disaster and its consequences 20 years later. The film is told from the perspective of a group of survivors, and people who were on duty at the reactor during that fateful night. This is the first time that these people have returned to the “Zone”, to reconcile their past within the ruins of the present….

View this movie at cultureunplugged.com
Today in Belarus, over 7000 children await treatment for cardiac conditions that would be practically routine matters in the United States or Europe. The country’s health services are already stretched to the breaking point,  and the waiting list grows by an estimated 800 to 1000 children every year.….
https://nuclear-news.net/2014/04/25/1500-children-likely-to-develop-heart-problems-on-a-yearly-basis-effects-of-the-fukushima-nuclear-disaster-banned-by-face-book/

On Sunday the 27 April 2013 in a little room somewhere off Grays Inn road London, a meeting took place. In this meeting was Ms Tamara Krasitskava of the Ukrainian NGO “Zemlyaki”.

In this meeting she quoted that only 40 percent of the evacuees that moved to Kiev after the disaster are alive today! And lets leave the statistics out of it for a moment and we find out of 44,000 evacuated to Kiev only 19,000 are left alive. None made it much passed 40 years old…

…..3.2 million with health effects and this includes 1 million children…

T .Kraisitskava

“….I was told to not talk of the results from Belarus as the UK public were not allowed to know the results we were finding!….”

A.Cameron (Belarus health worker from UK)

https://nuclear-news.net/2013/05/02/chernobyl-london-meeting-27-april-2013-speech-by-tamara-krasitskava-from-zemlyaki/

….I suddenly started bleeding from my nose, and it wouldn’t stop. I thought, “what on Earth?” I’ve rarely ever had a nosebleed so it was quite a shock. After that, I had nosebleeds at night for days after. But when I went to the hospital, they said “there’s currently no medical connection between nosebleeds and radiation” and they severed a capillary in my nose membrane with a laser.

Also, after I went [to Fukushima], I felt a great deal of fatigue. The staff who went with me and the chief of Futaba-machi suffered from nosebleeds and fatigue. They say the radiation levels are low so there’s no harm, but I wonder about that…..

http://kotaku.com/japanese-manga-stirs-up-fukushima-nuclear-controversy-1573381718

 

May 9, 2014 - Posted by | Uncategorized

4 Comments »

  1. FEAR of nuclear annihilation convinced world leaders to

    1. Forbid public information on the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima on 6 Aug 1945, and

    2. Form the UN on 24 Oct 1945

    Click to access Chapter_2.pdf

    We cannot safely harvest the energy (E) stored as mass (m) in the cores of atoms unless we first correct false, post-1945 models of the cores of:
    a.) Heavy atoms like Uranium
    b.) Ordinary stars like the Sun

    – Oliver K. Manuel

    Comment by omanuel | May 9, 2014 | Reply

  2. The sane and rational response of fear and respect for radiation is labelled radiophobia..as though it is a psychological . This analysis shows that respect for and fear of radiation is entirely justified. Marie Curie and her daughter had no fear of radiation even though she coined the name. She died of leukemia.

    Comment by mariannewildart | May 9, 2014 | Reply

  3. Reblogged this on Radiation Free Lakeland and commented:
    The sane and rational response of fear and respect for radiation is labelled radiophobia..as though it is a psychological . This analysis shows that respect for and fear of radiation is entirely justified. Marie Curie and her daughter had no fear of radiation even though she coined the name and discovered radium. She and her daughter died of leukemia.

    Comment by mariannewildart | May 9, 2014 | Reply

  4. Thanks Sean. I wonder what happened to Wikipedia’s attempts to make people who were paid to post report it? They were debating that recently. No way that volunteers can keep up with paid hacks changing their work. Wiki is returning to the way it was a decade ago, it seems, when anything that I read which I knew anything about was false. What is meant by low doses is getting muddled up everywhere. One thing which no one is talking about is the difference between low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, low LET radiation, and high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, high LET radiation. If you look carefully at the BEIR report which says that risk increases linearly with dose and that there is no safe dose, it is only for external, low LET radiation! For High LET the dangers are worse! Low LET is x-rays, gamma, and beta. High LET is alpha radionuclides like plutonium and americium. Neutrons are also high LET. Then there is the distinction between internal committed dose and external. So, when people talk about low dose I don’t know what they mean anymore! Since it’s all dangerous it shouldn’t matter but it does, unfortunately, when arguing standards, etc. There is also the amount of energy emitted, which varies. And, neutrons can make non-radioactive materials radioactive!

    Comment by miningawareness | May 9, 2014 | Reply


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.